On-Policy vs Off-Policy Learning: Direct Experience or Observation

This page was last edited on 12 November 2025

On-Policy Learning uses the same policy to generate actions and learn from them.
Off-Policy Learning learns from one policy (target) while collecting data using another (behavior).

In short:

  • On-policy: Learn from what you do.
  • Off-policy: Learn from what others (or past versions of yourself) did.

Why do we use On-Policy vs Off-Policy Learning in Deep RL?

We use them to control how agents explore and learn from experience.

  • On-policy is good for safe, stable learning, but often inefficient.
  • Off-policy is more sample efficient and allows learning from past or other agents’ experiences.

Choosing between them depends on:

  • data availability;
  • task complexity;
  • and computation limits;

ANALOGY

On-policy is like a chef who learns only by tasting their own cooking.
Off-policy is like a chef who learns by watching others cook and improve recipes based on observations.

HISTORY

The distinction started early in RL theory.

  • Q-learning (1989): First major off-policy algorithm.
  • SARSA (1996): Popular on-policy method.
  • Deep RL extended these ideas:
    • DQN (2015) = off-policy
    • A3C/PPO (2016–2017) = on-policy

The split was necessary to deal with limited compute and data.

On-Policy vs Off-Policy implementation steps

On-Policy (e.g. PPO)

  1. Collect trajectories using current policy.
  2. Calculate returns and advantages.
  3. Update the policy with gradient ascent.
  4. Repeat.

Off-Policy (e.g. DQN)

  1. Collect experiences into replay buffer.
  2. Sample mini-batch randomly.
  3. Compute target Q-values.
  4. Update network using loss.
  5. Repeat.

References:


Reward Shaping << Previous | Next >> Agent